Lexmark has been the center of many recent conversations. Are they an acquisition target? Can they survive given their size relative to industry behemoth’s HP, Xerox, Ricoh and Canon? Can Lexmark compete against larger rivals when offering global managed print service engagements? How will they create a competitive advantage against much larger rivals?

This past week I attended a briefing with the executive team at Lexmark, hosted at their corporate headquarters in Lexington, Kentucky to answer many of these questions. It is clear that Lexmark is operating with a new mandate given the increasing openness and transparency, which is a welcome breath of fresh air.

If you haven’t been watching closely, you might missed Lexmark’s increasing wins of MPS engagements. In fact, they’ve has had 20 wins with Fortune 500 accounts in the last 18 months. They also claim to have taken a leadership position in the “smart MFP” segment ($1,000+ A4 MFP’s). In addition, Lexmark has been investing heavily in MPS infrastructure for the last 10 years.  And of course, there is the fairly recent acquisition of Perceptive Software, a leading provider of ECM software.

So can they compete against much larger rivals?

Yes. In fact, Lexmark has a unique competitive advantage – their long history of vertical market focus. When you combine their deep vertical market expertise with strong global MPS delivery capabilities, Lexmark is in a unique position to deliver highly differentiated, compelling business transformation solutions. In fact, Lexmark has been doing this for years with little fanfare, but significant results in improving customer business processes.

Their deep vertical expertise gives them insight into the business processes and requirements allowing them to move beyond simple device consolidation to significantly improving the customer’s business results. Let me repeat that, not just saving money but changing business results. If you don’t believe it, just look at their dominance in several industry verticals including:

  • Retail: 90% share global and US; MPS share 50% global & 30% US
  • Financial: 70% global and US, MPS share 50% global, 30% US
  • Healthcare: 30% US
  • Government: 70% US
  • Education 30% US
  • 36% of Fortune 50 Companies are Lexmark Customers
  • 24% of Fortune 50 companies are Lexmark MPS Customers

In fact, Lexmark claims that the majority of their wins are coming at the expense of much larger rivals HP and Xerox. They also claim their significant investment in total MPS infrastructure (technology, people, knowledge, management metrics and partnerships) provide them with a competitive edge in delivering MPS more efficiently than their competitors. When we speak to Xerox, HP, Ricoh and other major vendors, they all make similar claims. Without objective, quantifiable benchmarking metrics by a third party it is difficult if not impossible to validate these claims.

In our discussions with corporate decision makers, we typically hear feedback that while Xerox and HP are viewed as having significant advantages due to their scale and global presence, Lexmark can be more flexible in developing and deploying solutions. Clearly Lexmark has deep vertical expertise and industry insight, but does this make up for size?

Size and scale can be a major advantage in working with global accounts. As Lexmark has shown, flexibility and vertical expertise can also be a significant advantage in winning global accounts. But is it enough?

Photizo Group MPS MarketWatch™ clients will receive a timely analysis through a MPS Blip and MPS MarketFlash delivered through the exclusive Photizo Group client portal.

Photizo Group is the leading advisor to firms seeking to transform their businesses by building a successful service business. Providing research, consulting, information services, education and events, Photizo Group offers the broadest portfolio of transformation services in the industry.